Tuesday, November 20, 2007

I Cannot Tell a Lie


Nearly 300 years ago, a six year old boy was supposed to have uttered the words, "I cannot tell a lie, I cut the tree". His name was George Washington, and he grew up to be an American President.

This tale has been told and retold to underscore two points: firstly, it serves as a reminder to all parents that it is quite unwise to allow children to run amok with sharp axes or hatchets, and secondly, it shows that honesty and integrity are values to be treasured in any person, more so when that person is in a position of social or political importance.

While American historians still argue about the veracity of that tale, we should all feel honored that we ourselves have our own version of this tale, though with a decidedly Malaysian twist.


In recent statements, the Election Commission (EC) chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman quoted George Washington almost in verbatim, and affirmed the fact that he knew when the next general election would be held:



The Star (Friday, November 16, 2007): Election Commission chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman has indicated that he knows when the next general election will be called.

"I can’t lie to you that I don’t know when the next general election will be held," he said.

As the position as the EC chairman comes with a certain degree of responsibility, there were many in this fair land who did not doubt that Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul did indeed know the dates. After all, as the EC chairman, his position warrants him to be a man that emphasizes strict adherence to duty and sacrifice.

However, the fact that he had the gumption to publicly announce that he knew the dates for the general dates - when even Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak was in the dark about this issue - raised more than a few curious eyebrows, leading to whispering in dark corners of possible collusion between the ruling coalition and an independent and impartial election commission.

Thanfully, our beloved Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi himself rose to the forefront of this with a none too gentle rebuke to Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman, and this did much to disabuse many a conspiracist theorist of any possible allegation of collusion:


The Star (Monday, November 19, 2007): Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the power to dissolve Parliament is exclusively his.

The Prime Minister said it was not possible for Election Commission chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman to know when the next general election would take place.

"How would he know? I have yet to dissolve Parliament to pave the way for the elections. It's I who will decide when to have Parliament dissolved," he said at a press conference after his visit to the Islamic Civilisation Park in Pulau Wan Man here yesterday.

A day later, Tan Sri Abdul Rashid publicly retractment his admission - though oddly enough this seemed to have only appeared in the Sun - saying that he did not indeed know the dates for the next general election:

The Sun (Tuesday, 20 November 2007): After getting some flak for saying he knows when the next general election will be held, Election Commission chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman yesterday backtracked and said that he did not know the dates.

He said the EC will only set the election campaign period and polling date after the King has approved the dissolution of Parliament.


"Curiouser and curiouser", as Alice in Wonderland would say.

Indeed, it is quite curious that the EC chairman to have even made that statement in the first place, much less know the dates (if he did indeed know). Had Tan Sri Abdul Rashid deliberately misled the public about this matter, or had the reporters perhaps jumped the gun on this? If the former, then it would not be the first time that his detractors have accused him of this:


The Sun (March 28, 2007): Election Commission (EC) chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman was criticised today for a recent statement in which he challenged opposition parties to bring him to court if they thought the commission was unfair or not transparent.

The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) also questioned Abdul Rashid for saying the EC’s role was not to make law.

Repeating earlier calls for Abdul Rashid to resign, coalition spokesman Sivarasa Rasiah described his statement as “misleading” as he had ignored recent developments where the courts had addressed the role of the EC and the process and conduct of elections.


If the latter, then it should be the reporters who should be bent over for misleading the public, and possibly defaming the character of Tan Sri Abdul Rashid. Yes, perhaps this explanation would fit best, since most of us cannot in good conscience say that Tan Sri Abdul Rashid was caught in a lie, any more than I can say that it was our beloved Prime Minister was the one lying.

Or does this misunderstanding - or perhaps a misquote - bode for darker deeds?

Conspiracy theorists in Malaysia are naturally having a field day with this issue - an alleged collusion between an independent and impartial election commission with that of the ruling coalition - especially with the latest news that the tenure for the EC chairman may be extended for another year, as shown below:


The Star (Tuesday, November 20, 2007): Election Commission (EC) chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman may stay on for another year following the proposed amendment to the Federal Constitution to extend the retirement age of EC members from 65 to 66.

Scheduled to retire on Dec 31 as he reaches 65, Abdul Rashid now has the option of staying on one more year because the bill states that the new age of retirement applies to a member of the EC appointed after the coming into operation of the proposed act.


That this bill is tabled by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Abd Aziz, and that the extension of the tenure of Tan Sri Abdul Rashid into the coming election year requires that our already badly tattered Federal Constitution be amended, is sure to further stoke the flames of conspiracy theorists far and wide.

But as Tan Sri Abdul Rashid so passionately put it, "If they will show me evidence that the commission has rigged elections, then I will – in fact, all members of the commission – will resign" (The Star, Tuesday, November 20 2007), conspiracy theories can only go so far without proof.

I'm not sure George Washington would have approved.

8 comments:

WY said...

THanks for pointing out the fact that they are AGAIN amending our FEDERAL CONSTITUTION.

Sometimes i wonder, those lawmakers in Parliament know anything about Constitution. It is NOT meant to be amended at willy nilly. the US Constitution was only amended for the total of 27 times in its history.Malaysia? I wonder.

Conspiracy or not...it is just too damn plain obvious, and the gomen just doesn't care...because us voters don't seem to do anything!

Crankster said...

I cannot lie? More like I cannot tell the truth..

After over a week, he wants PROOF that the elections are rigged.

It must be a lot of evidence destroyed if it took so long to clean up and look spiffy..

Anonymous said...

I think that the government can change the constitution anytime it so wishes when it has a two-thirds majority.
So, it is not surprising that it will continually change it to suit its purposes.
Perhaps the BN it can be changed to allow the PM a life term, much like what the presidents of some banana republics did.
However, don't publicise this or our PM may get wise to it!

DaRealDeal said...

It seems under the current PM everyone's yapping off their mouths for some cheap attention.

20 Cent said...

Dear rational thinker,

From what Wikipedia tells me, our poor Federal Constitution has been subject to 650 individual amendments in 42 instances. Dunno if it's correct, but that's what Professor Shad says.

If this is accurate, I guess we can change that to 651 individual amendments in 43 instances, just for another year in office.


Dear Crankshaft,

Its kinda strange, isn't it? With all the figures BERSIH is throwing around, they say they still need substantiation. Indeed, it must be clerical error ;)


Dear Anonymous,

Thanks so much for putting the last part in! Gave me a good laugh, it did!


Dear DaRealDeal,

Thanks for voicing out your opinion, dude. Have to admit you are right ;)

You yap about your stand, I yap about my stand, and others nap even when they stand.

Da Real Dael said...

Dear 20 Cent

Could he be the original Napster?

Crankster said...

Yeah, if clerical error can be translated as blatant stupidity. :)

20 Cent said...

Dear da real deal,

Nah, no one can take a nap like 20 cent can ;)

Dear creankshaft,

Nah, that would be a compliment. Even Forest Gump was a likeable character ;)